Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared arrow $1 billion & 1 year plus campaign just for a president

$1 billion & 1 year plus campaign just for a president Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Tuesday, 10 January 2012

The process of selecting the next American president will extend for more than a year and cost  more than $1 billion. It is effectively a weighted direct election, defeating the original intention of the founding fathers. In the meantime Australia's republican movement is still debating after twenty long years  whether the president should be directly elected.

Image

In Australia, a federal election campaign lasts 30 days and costs less than a single Senate race in California,” writes
Paul Sheehan in his recent piece on the interminable American presidential election campaign  (“US shows why elections should be a sprint, not a marathon,” The Sydney Morning Herald 5 January5, 2012)

“Anyone who thinks Australia would be better served by having a directly elected president as head of state does not understand why such a model will doom the republican movement,” he adds.

“The debate has never been about attitudes to the monarchy so much as it is about the reluctance of the electorate to add a new layer of pomp and politics to federal government.”

“We have a simpler, superior system in place to the one now on show in the United States”
 


...direct election proposed...

 

The republicans have heard Dr John Hirst tell them to change their failed current policy and go for direct election.  (We have discussed other aspects of his lecture to the assembled republican movement here.)  Dr.Hirst, a respected historian, is an old hand in republican circles going back to the Keating Turnbull Repuablic Advistory Committe. 
 
The movement's policy for the last decade has been not  have a policy on what sort of republic they want to impose on this reluctant nation.

But Dr Hirst thinks electors won’t support a republic unless they elect the president.  Other republicans don't agree.  For example, ACU Vice Chancellor Professor Greg Craven says that once the people understand the dangers of direct election - he for one will make sure they do in any referendum - the republican defeat will make 1999 seem like some sort of victory.
 
 Now Dr Hirst is unfortunately  mistaken as to three significant aspects of the 1998 Constitutional Convention. These could have  influenced him in his enthusiastic announcement of his particular silver bullet. He misunderstands ARM policy in the convention election, how the non- elected delegates were chosen, and the about final vote.




...mistake about ARM's policy in 1998....
 
 
 
 

 
 

    He believes that voters in 1998 had three main choices. They could vote for candidates promising to support the monarchy; “candidates from the ARM who were committed to an Australian head of state elected by the parliament,” and the Real Republicans who wanted the people to elect the president.

Dr Hirst is completely wrong about the ARM. They went to the election claiming their minds were not closed about direct election. But as soon as the poll closed, their minds slammed shut.

Too clever by half, the ARM then tried to manipulate the agenda so that the direct election delegates would be neutralised.

The direct electioneers then threatened to walk out. The Convention was only saved by the mediation of my predecessor Justice Lloyd Waddy who brought the warring republicans together.




... mistake about the composition of the Convention...




Dr Hirst's second misunderstanding is about the composition of the Convention. “The elected delegates met in Convention with an equal number of appointed delegates carefully chosen to represent the community in a balanced way by gender and ethnicity and age.”

No they didn’t. The convention was made up of 76 elected, 40 ex officio and only 36 nominated delegates, not the 76 Dr Hirst believes. Some were chosen for eminence and others for balance so that, for example, youthful and indigenous voices could be heard.

Dr Hirst may be mistaken, but at least he is not like so many republicans who fabricate myths about John Howard. Of the 36 delegates nominated by John Howard, only 10 were constitutional monarchists.


John Howard did not rig the Convention; but how often do you read or hear that he did? Do people who write or announce this lie have no shame?




..... mistake about the vote...


 
 


  
 
Dr Hirsts’s third error is about the voting.   He says that after an exhaustive consideration of all options, the Convention “voted for a president endorsed by a two-thirds vote of a joint sitting of parliament. “

Not so.  A check of the records will show that the Keating Turnbull - or bypartisan model - was two short of a majority of the Convention.  John Howard had said that if the convention approved a model he would put that to the referendum.  Since it was overwhelmingly approved by the republican delegates, he decided that it would be sensible to put it to the people.  He was unusually and lavishly praised for this both by the republicans and in the media. 
 
But when the republicans lost the referendum they had to find a reason, so they invented myths about how badly John Howard had behaved and how he had ensured that their republic would be defeated.  



...direct election...

 
 
Dr Hirst suggests some curious and complicated models for a guided democracy in which the presidential candidates will be chosen.

It is unlikely that the politician republicans would choose any of them. Most are wedded to a parliamentary appointment, although when he was planning to leave Parliament as a result of the loss of the Liberal leadership in late 2009, Malcolm Turnbull announced that he nowcould  tolerate direct election.

This was in a media blitz in the Murdoch press in England and Australia (" Malcolm Turnbull returns to the fray," 24 January 2010 )  It seemed as if he were thinking of reviving his involvement in republicanism to replace his parliamentary role .


And nNo doubt the ARM leadership was excited at the thought of the Turnbull millions flowing again into their coffers. 


But after John Howard persuaded him to stay in Parliament, he has been very quiet on this issue. 

He even appeared at the recent Great Hall reception for The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh.
 
 
 
 

 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31