Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow People's Republic? arrow Communist support for republic

Communist support for republic Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Saturday, 08 July 2006
Hammer and sickle

If you saw some of the ABC programmes on the Communist Party of Australia in recent years you would have thought that they were no different than a benign, well intentioned church going group. Of course idealists once came to communism as the answer to the excesses of capitalism, especially after the depression. But the idealists were soon expelled or they left. The Communist Party planned to turn Australia into a peoples’ republic. Failing this they were ready to sabotage anything here to further the interests of the Soviet Union, which financed and directed them. Their only spark of independence came towards the end, and that led to the split into three communist parties, one Russian, one Chinese and one neutral.

The Communist Party of Australia was revived in recent years as a result of a name change by the Socialist Party. In the 1999 referendum campaign, the Party argued predictably that the monarchy is an “unwanted relic of feudalism in England and colonialism in Australia.” The comrades declared it irrelevant to the people of Australia. The party joined with the elites in the media and among the politicians to endorse the Keating –Turnbull model as “ an important, progressive step forward.”

Just before the referendum, on 20 October 1999, their journal, The Guardian reported that “a recent survey by Newspoll found that 64 percent of voters support Australia becoming a republic and 95 per cent believe Australia's head of state should be an Australian.” (Actually, in the year preceding the referendum, Newspoll recorded the level of support some sort of republic, which is in itself is meaningless. These fluctuated from about the mid forty percent to about the mid 50 percent, and never ever reached 64%. But on 12 September,1999 Newspoll inextricably changed to a convoluted question (see below) which obviously confused respondents and was never repeated.It is interesting that the comrades chose this one and ignored the others). The Guardian thundered to those who listened :

“The Communist Party urges you to vote "YES" for an Australian republic.”

They put out a pamphlet, For an independent and democratic republic of Australia.

No doubt they support the republicans latest plans to throw out our constitution.

NEWSPOLL QUESTION:

NOW I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU THREE BROAD QUESTIONS FOR AUSTRALIA IN REGARDS TO A REPUBLIC. ONE POSSIBILITY IS TO CHANGE TO A REPUBLIC WITH A PRESIDENT WHO IS ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE. A SECOND POSSIBILITY IS TO CHANGE TO A REPUBLIC WITH A PRESIDENT WHO IS APPOINTED BY PARLIAMENT. AND A THIRD POSSIBILITY IS TO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING, KEEPING THE QUEEN AND THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IN THEIR CURRENT ROLES. WHICH ONE OF THESE POSSIBILITIES WOULD YOU YOURSELF MOST PREFER?

The answers were 50%,. 14% and 32% with 4% uncommitted.

 
< Prev
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31