Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Media and monarchy arrow Leading republican in a red bandana

Leading republican in a red bandana Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Saturday, 06 August 2011

 When he's not campaigning to shred Australia's flag, author and leading republican Peter FitzSimons regularly uses his column in Sydney's Sun Herald to launch attacks on our constitutional system. The object of his dislike – apart from our Flag - is the Australian crown.

Mr. FitzSimons was the subject – or shall we say the object – of an editorial in The Spectator Australia on 6 August 2011. The editorial opened: “In September 2001, when the ruins of the World Trade Centre were still smoking, rich ageing Leftie Peter FitzSimons wrote a column in which he apologised to the terrorists responsible for the atrocity.”

Image
 


The editorial  was about Mr. FitzSimon's campaign against the nation’s leading broadcaster, Alan Jones.  Spectator Australia attributes this to the fact that Mr Jones is a very successful broadcaster, and Mr FitzSimons was not.



...tabloid tale...
  



 On Sunday 31 July 2011 Mr. FitzSimons, who these days sports a red bandana, used a story in an American gossip magazine which claimed to be an exposé on Prince Andrew. He admits that the allegations have been denied by the Prince. But he still repeats the allegation, claiming the magazine, Vanity Fair, is “no tabloid tittle-tattle rag”. 

Peter, let me into a trade secret. Any publication which publishes such junk is, by definition, a tabloid tittle–tattle rag.  In the meantime,  Prince Andrew’s most prominent critic has attacked him on the floor of Parliament and in the opinion columns of the London Daily Mirror.



(Continued below)

But the MP seems to live in a glass house. He claimed £92,000 in expenses over the five years leading up to the 2009 scandal over MPs' expenses,  “flipping” the expenses on a second home twice to increase interest expenses.

A former Anglican clergyman, he delighted the tabloid tittle-tattle rags when as an MP he posed in his underpants on a gay dating site.  So you would think he would stick to government business, live within his allowance and  not  throw stones based on salacious rumours.
 



...defamation....




 As to the piece in Vanity Fair, remember one thing. Judicial activism in United States has almost completely destroyed any possibility of protecting a person's reputation through the law, which is not the case in the United Kingdom or Australia.

In America you can make up any appalling lie about anyone prominent and they can’t do anything about it. The Supreme Court justices changed the law in one particular case in 1964 ( New York Times Co. v. Sullivan). They did not want the plaintiff to win in a defamation case.

Why? He was a Public Safety Commissioner involved in suppressing civil rights demonstrations in Alabama.  The trouble with this sort of decision is that courts are not really well-placed to legislate – this time by a constitutional interpretation-  and they usually can't envisage the consequences of one decision which seems all right in the circumstances.


At least in Australia when the High Court showed signs of going down the same track, wiser heads prevailed and the bench soon beat a retreat.
The report In Vanity Fair is clearly defamatory. So is its repetition in Peter FitzSimon's column. It is no defence to say that that the Prince denies the story

.
The story is also in breach of the Press Council principles to which the Herald subscribes. These expressly provide that publications “should take reasonable steps to ensure reports are accurate, fair and balanced.”  Further, the Principles declare  that anything published should “respect for the privacy and sensibilities of individuals.”

Exceptions are “ matters of public record or obvious or significant public interest.” As Mr. FitzSimons would know, an alleged but denied sexual liaison is not of obvious or significant public interest. It is merely prurient.




...untouchable...






The story also claims that The Queen’s award  of a knighthood to the Prince makes him "untouchable", presumably by the media.This is a ridiculous and untrue assertion

.
As Mr FitzSimon's himself would know, nobody is untouchable, at least in our free countries. Passertion.As Mr FitzSimon's himself would know, nobody is untouchable, at least in our free countries. .

He concludes this piece in these words: “Grubby, grubby, grubby. Just how long will Australian monarchists be able to get away with the notion that the so-called royal family has this mythical morality and are, by birth, a cut above the rest of us?”
 


Grubby, grubby, grubby
  

 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31