Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Convenor's Column arrow Philip Benwell attacks Governor-General; "Dont subvert the constitution"-"Fin Review

Philip Benwell attacks Governor-General; "Dont subvert the constitution"-"Fin Review Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Sunday, 10 June 2001

 Mr Philip Benwell of the Australian Monarchist League has had two letters in the Herald, which is his right.

At the Convention the Monarchist League delegates refused, with the ACM delegates to vote “tactically”. This was to throw our weight behind the McGarvie model. If we had done that the McGarvie model would have obtained a majority, and would have been the model in the referendum. The ARM was terrified that we would do this – even though we said we would not as a matter of principle support any republican model. Moreover voting the argument vote “tactically” meant not only supporting the McGarvie model at the Convention – it meant opposing it at the referendum. This we would not do. And the Monarchist League delegates agreed with us on this.

Of course we may from time to time disagree on other matters –, as any of us will. As I do in relation to Philip Benwell’s two letters.

In one, he charged Archbishop Hollingworth with hypocrisy in accepting the Governor-Generalship. I think this view is harsh. As the Archbishop said at the Constitutional Convention, “my head inclines the one way and my heart another”. The Archbishop saw the Convention’s task as producing the best republican model to be put to the people. In any event he abstained on the crucial vote on what he correctly saw as a flawed republican model. He says he is happy with Australia’s current constitutional arrangements. In this he is like the overwhelming majority of Australians.

 Philip Benwell’s second letter was on the doctorate recently awarded by the Archbishop of Canterbury. True, there was no thesis, nor examination, as in the Ph.D. But it is not, as reported, an honorary doctorate. It is a higher doctorate. These are awarded for outstanding work, usually published in the field of the doctorate. Thus the LL.D., the Doctor of Laws, is awarded for published work of great distinction on the law. A Higher doctorate ranks before a Ph.D., and the SJD and similar degrees (a doctorate which includes both coursework and a thesis). It has nothing to do with an honorary doctorate. So it would be quite correct to address the Archbishop as Dr Hollingworth.

To return to and end on republicanism generally. It is clear that the question of a republic remains on the agenda.

The Australian Financial Review published this extract from my article in the latest issue of Quadrant.

This was  in their “Notebook” , which appears on theopinion pages .

The headline was :

 " Don't subvert our Constitution"  11-5-2001

 David Flint, the convener of Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, in the latest Quadrant writes:" Now we have a plan to circumvent, indeed to subvert, our constitution. According to this plan, before any referendum on a republic, we are to have the French dictator's [Napoleon Bonaparte] favourite device, the constitutional plebiscite. And not one, two!

hat alone is bad enough. But there is worse.

Remember that this plan comes from the same people who failed, over the decade of the 1990s, to come up with an alternative republican constitutional model which would work. They failed in 1993, and they failed again in 1999.

Knowing this, they are now asking, they are inviting, and indeed beseeching, a vote of no confidence in the existing Constitution ... If [this happens], they actually intend this to be followed by a constitutional vacuum to last over the decade. This is breathtaking in its irresponsibility ...

Apart from the waste of taxpayers' money, as well as the legislators', the governments' and the people's time, this exercise should be condemned. Not only does it propose to subvert the Constitution.

Worse, the clear intent is to create a loss of confidence in the present Australian Constitution without any guarantee that after the resulting decade of instability a new constitutional model will be produced which will be acceptable to the people ... This is not the way the founders prescribed for constitutional change."

 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31
Latest ACM News: -