Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Prince Charles arrow Republican calls for a reappraisal of Prince Charles

Republican calls for a reappraisal of Prince Charles Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Saturday, 23 April 2011
A prominent republican has warned against personal attacks on the Royal Family. In particular he has called for a reappraisal of their assessment of Prince Charles.


Image

To many republicans, Prince Charles’ accession  is seen as their silver bullet. This won’t be, for reasons which I explain below.

Personal republicans attacks were intense during the referendum campaign, and afterwards. They didn’t stop with the Royal Family; constitutional monarchists in certain  professions were singled out for particular treatment.

 But not all republicans are playing the royal man rather than the constitutional ball, writes David Ritter in The Australian (23/4).

But, he says, some republicans do seem to think ridicule is essential to winning the hearts and minds of their compatriots.David Ritter is Head of Biodiversity Campaigns at Greenpeace UK in London. 

One of  Australia's leading indigenous land rights lawyers,  his most recent book is Contesting Native Title (Allen & Unwin, 2009).




...benefit of non-partisan moral leadership...


    A republican, he does concede that  there is social benefit in having recognised sources of non-partisan moral leadership.

Now of all the members of the Royal family, Australian republicans have singled out Prince Charles for vituperation.

That’s because the strategy of many, especially the republican politicians, is that with his accession some sort of republic will fall like a ripe fruit into their laps.Dream on, comrades. Getting a republic is not like being eligible for your very generous taxpayer funded superannuation.

It doesn’t work like that.You have to persuade the people that the precise details of your proposal are, as our Founders put it,  “desirable, irresistible and inevitable”

And since they haven’t been able to work out even a rough outline of what they want you have just not reached first base.

Australia’s republicans have not proved to be the world’s best strategists or tacticians.

With everything going for them in 1999, they managed to lose every state and 72% of electorates.

Then there was the Mate for a Head of State. That was so excruciatingly embarrassing that it was hard not to feel sorry for the blighters.    "Australian republicans could do worse than take a fresh look at the much maligned Prince Charles," writes David Ritter.


  (Continued below)

 

"It has proven all too easy to deride the heir apparent for his human foibles. But what is less well observed in Australia is the moral leadership, carefully practised within appropriate constitutional limits, of the Prince."Consider, for example, the Prince's efforts on rainforests and climate change. Charles has a record of advocacy for practical action that puts many democratically elected leaders to shame. As a politically neutral catalyst, the prince has done a great deal of good."In 2009, as the global climate negotiations tumbled to the ignominious debacle of all-round failure at Copenhagen, it was the prince's Rainforests Project that catalysed momentum on the issue of reducing emissions from the destruction of forests. Deforestation is responsible for about one-fifth of global emissions and now, thanks to the prince's initiative, an international fast start partnership to reduce emissions from deforestation is operational."Charles has since established a broader International Sustainability Unit to seek action on other great transnational environmental problems including a project on the need for a transformation of the world's fisheries. It is a commendable initiative."So what is the lesson for republicans?

"To avoid ad hominem attacks on the Windsors and to pursue a less shrill vision of republicanism. We may not need the monarchy but that is not to say that there are no benefits associated with traditional institutions per se. Bulwarks are required against the destructive effects of global capitalism. Additional forms of leadership and social glue are required for a good society.
"Just removing the Windsors will not build an Australian republic in the truest sense.

"It is time for a more civil republicanism."
   
 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
December 2017 January 2018
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 48 1 2
Week 49 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Week 50 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Week 51 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Week 52 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Week 53 31