Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?

Egypt: a new dawn? Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Monday, 14 February 2011

The handover of power in Egypt to the army has been greeted with rapture in Egypt and relieved approval in Western political circles, particularly by governments long happy to support and praise President Mubarak.

(Rather than just mechanically add its approval, the Australian government should now correct the inexplicable decision taken by the Rudd government to abandon that persecuted minority, the Copts.) 

The Egyptian army of course is not outside of the political or commercial arena. It is an integral part of the regime over which Hosni Mubarak presided.

Moreover, the Army’s coup d’état in 1952 ended the only liberal period in Egypt’s long history. It is the cause of Egypt's current distress. 

There has recently been a reappraisal in Egypt of the role of King Farouk and of the system. A comparison with what followed leads to only one conclusion as to which was preferable.

When Britain terminated the protectorate in 1922, Egypt adopted a constitution, based on that of Belgium, defining the King’s executive powers and established a bicameral legislature.  An electoral law provided for universal male suffrage, the indirect election of deputies to the Assembly with a Senate half elected and half appointed.

Image
[ King Farouk, Queen feridaand Princess Ferial ]

 



....Egypt's liberal age...         



The Cambridge History of Egypt, Volume 2: Modern Egypt, describes the period between 1923 and 1952 as Egypt's liberal age. It says:

 European-style constitutionalism and political pluralism were incorporated into the country's political landscape.

The period witnessed genuine, though irregular, electoral competition among individuals and groups, cross-class participation in the process, and an operative, if imperfect, system of political and civil liberties.

While elites controlled democratic practice, people from humble social classes also engaged in political activity.

Eager for independence from British control and for social and economic reform, the population considered competing ideologies for Egypt's political and economic development including western-style liberalism, monarchy, Islamic fundamentalism, Marxism, feminism, and secular nationalism.

The result was of course not perfect.

As The Cambridge History says:

... the excessive powers of the monarchy, ( in comparison with the UK today, but not say, at the time of the Glorious Revolution) the lack of an indigenous bourgeoisie with political strength, and the absence of a developed proletariat able to defend the liberal experiment combined to impede pluralistic democratic development.



...end of liberalism, persecution and expulsions...



That said, it should be recalled that with the exception of Israel, democracy, limited government and the separation of church and state have not been concepts overwhelmingly welcomed in the Middle East.

The end of the constitutional monarchy signalled the end of liberal, cosmopolitan Egypt, as it has in other countries. The republicans expelled the Jewish, Greek and other European communities and seized their real property without compensation. The assets of companies with any European, Jewish, or Christian involvement were also seized, again without compensation.

Copts were deemed to be second class Egyptians, and have been subjected to discriminatory treatment and persecution.
 


...foreign adventures of the one party state...




Egypt became a one party state. Allying itself for a time with the Soviet Union, the military government embarked on ruinous socialist policies within and futile attempts under the banner of Pan Arabism to create a vast united Arab state.

External adventurism ended with the death of Colonel Nasser, but the regime has never restored the personal and political freedoms and institutions which once made Egypt a robust cosmopolitan and imperfect parliamentary state.





...something worse?... 

 

 

[Continues below]

 

There is of course no guarantee that the transfer of power to the Army will result in Egypt becoming a democracy. Notwithstanding the nostalgia for the monarchy which swept across Egypt last year it is unlikely that a return to constitutional monarchy will be considered by the army when it determines what should be done. Instead too much will be invested in the search for the perfect leader to be  President.  

 Any student of history can tell you where events in Egypt are headed, warns William Tucker in The American  Spectator (2/4) .

The French Revolution set the historical prototype and, with only a few exceptions, it's been the same ever since. A country under authoritarian rule develops a middle class.

This articulate, legal-minded group agitates against the arbitrary rule until it finally overthrows the ancien régime in the name of representative government.

However, the "revolution" quickly runs into two problems:

1) the overwhelming mass of people who don't care much about democracy but simply want "peace, bread and land," as Lenin expressed it, and/or

2) a highly organized illiberal party of fanatics ready to seize power in the name of some utopian scheme.

Often the two mesh. The result is a Committee on Public Safety or Lenin's Bolsheviks or the Ayatollah Khomeini's Islamic Revolution.

William Tucker says there was one exception:

The only exception to this pattern was the great American Revolution, where George Washington, Ben Franklin, James Madison, and the Founding Fathers were able to keep control of the process and wisely shepherded us into the truly representative system we still have today -- bless their hearts forever.”

Actually there was another, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 which set in place the institutions and principles which in many significant ways guided the American Founding Fathers.  Mr. Tucker continues:

It isn't going to happen in the Middle East. During the Iraq War, President George W. Bush was heard to lament, "Where are the George Washingtons, the Thomas Jeffersons, the John Adamses?" There are none. You need an enlightened cultural tradition built over centuries plus a population steeped in "republican virtue" to achieve such a thing.

The lesson surely is never to abandon a sound constitutional system without knowing what is to replace it. Unfortunately the Egyptian people were not even asked in 1952.

Should not all of the options be put on the table?



Image
[ Egyptian and Iranian Royal Families ]



[ First posted 12 February, 2011]

 
< Prev
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017 December 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 44 1 2 3 4
Week 45 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 46 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 47 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 48 26 27 28 29 30