Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Our Mission


To Preserve, To Protect and To Defend Our Heritage:

 Our Australian Constitutional System,

The Role of The Australian Crown in Our System  

&

  Our Flag

Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
Syndicate
ACM Home

Prorogue, then intimidate Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Thursday, 30 December 2010

Note: This column has been revised. In it I come to the conclusion that notwithstanding the prorogation of the session of the Parliament, the inquiry  under an upper house  committee chaired by the Rev. Fred Nile MP into the sale of the NSW  electricity stations can lawfully proceed and that the proceedings of the committee are privileged.

Although the elections in New South Wales are not until 26 March 2011, this final session of the 54th Parliament was prorogued on 22 December, 2010 by the Governor, Professor Marie Bashir, acting on the advice of the Premier, the Hon. Kristina Keneally.

According to Alexandra Smith in The Sydney Morning Herald, “Turn off: Keneally blocks probe into power sale by closing parliament “ 22/12, the government believes  this would have the result that committees cannot hold hearings before the election, especially the planned Legislative Council inquiry into the government's controversial $5.3 billion sale of the State's electricity assets.

This is doubtful for reasons set out below.




...electricity sales inquiry...


  

The announcement of the sale had led to the resignation of eight of the 11 board members of state-owned companies Eraring and Delta Electricity.

Image
[ Parliament House, Sydney]
 




 It was anticipated that those former board members would be called to a hearing of the inquiry. Their testimony could have been embarrassing the government.

While attempts are being made to open the inquiry, witnesses would be advised by their lawyers to give no or limited co-operation. This is because of the fear that the hearings may not be privileged, leaving witnesses open to defamation actions.  Hence The Sydney Morning Herald editorial (29/12), “Prorogue, then intimidate
 

Ms. Smith said that in a bid to stave off expected criticism of its timing, the government's statement highlighted other occasions when Parliament was prorogued well before an election.

This included the prorogations on 7 December, 1994 before the 1995 election and 31 January before the 2003 election.

 The Opposition had planned to reveal the details of the inquiry that very day including the proposed terms of reference and the expected t date of the first meeting. This was said to have been as early as 10 January 10. The inquiry had the support of the Greens and the Christian Democrat MP Fred Nile.  Ms. Smith said this meant the inquiry could have started as soon the procedural issues had been resolved.
 Mr. Nile says the inquiry began before the prorogation.
 
Moreover, Parliament was not expected to be prorogued until late February, according to the official calendar on the NSW Parliament’s website. 

But as Ms. Smith said, the government will have the benefit of not being in caretaker mode until the writs for the election are issued after 4 March 2011, which means the Premier can still make major policy announcements.





...the Governor...



The question is being asked whether the Governor should have granted the request. Constitutionally there will be occasions when advice to prorogue should be considered by the Governor under her reserve powers, that is where her decision is her own.

Such an occasion would arise if the Premier were seeking to close down the Parliament to avoid a vote of no confidence. This arose in Canada in 2008, where the Governor General exercised her powers in favour of the Prime Minister after a two hour meeting at Rideau Hall, her official residence.




...Canadian precedent...




There the minority government of the Prime Minister, the Rt. Hon. Stephen Harper PC MP, had been threatened with a vote of no confidence on the floor of the House of Commons.

The opposition Liberal and New Democratic Parties had signed an agreement to form a coalition government, and the Bloc Québécois has agreed to support the coalition on confidence issues.

Image
[ Governor General Michaelle Jean in the Canadian Parliament ]



The session was prorogued by a Royal Proclamation, in both the English and French languages, made under the authority of the Canadian Crown on 4 December 2008. 

It was not for long at that time of the year, a factor which was no doubt taken into consideration by the Governor General in making her decision. The new session was to begin  on 26 January, 2009.

(For the text of the Proclamation and for more details, see this column: “Royal solution to the Canadian political mess: an Antipodean view” 7 December 2008.)


 


..assessing  the prorogation...


[ Continued below]

The Proclamation was made not under a specific provision of the Canadian written constitution, the Constitution Act, 1867, nor under an act of parliament. It was made under the Royal Prerogative.

At the time I made four points:


First, if this is a crisis it is political, and certainly not constitutional. Indeed, rather than a crisis, it is more of a mess made by politicians acting instinctively as they do all around the world, attracted to the scent of and addicted to power.

Second, the Canadian Crown will play the key role in ensuring a constitutional solution to this crisis among the politicians.

Third, the powers of the Canadian Crown will be exercised by the Governor General ( no hyphen is used in Canada in contrast to the Australian Governor-General).

Fourth, the Governor General is above politics because of the crucial fact that she is appointed by, and owes her allegiance to the Sovereign - and through Her as a trustee for the people.  She does not owe any allegiance to the politicians who may have recommended her appointment, or to the particular party to which the politician belongs.  Nor is she a politican seeking her own reelction or obsessed by the ideas of mandate or political agenda.


Image
[ 27th Governor General 2005-2010l, Ms Michaelle Jean ]
 



In brief, I said, Governors General cannot have a mandate or a political agenda.  

The Crown, I said, would ensure the continuing peace order and good government of Canada according to fundamental constitutional principles in a way few systems can ensure.  And any necessary transition of power will be remarkably smooth.

I then made the point that if the opposition coalition and Bloc Québécois support held together until 26 January – “and there is some doubt about that - the government will be defeated in a vote of no confidence.”

As we reported here on 30 January, 2009 , “Canadian crisis evaporates”  they did not hold together.




...New South Wales in 2010 & 2011...


 

The power to prorogue in New South Wales is governed by the Royal Prerogative, subject to certain provisions in the Constitution relating to a vote of no confidence. Those provisions are not relevant in this case.

Dr  Anne Twomey has put the view that an exercise of the  reserve powers did not seem to arise in this NSW case; I agree.

The crucial question here is whether the committee of inquiry in to the power sales can continue. The chairman the Rev.Fred Nile indicates it will.

According to the Herald editorial on 29 December, “Prorogue, then intimidate, “Ms. Keneally is warning potential witnesses that they cannot be compelled to appear before the committee. If they do, anything they say would not be afforded the normal parliamentary privilege from legal action.

The Herald says this is based on legal advice about a prorogation 16 years ago when the  Crown solicitor opined that committees could not function after a prorogation.

But the Clerk of the Legislative Council, Lynn Lovelock, has advised the committee chairman, the Rev.Fred Nile, that the 1994 advice was ''restrictive'' and that hearings could proceed.

The editorial also says changes to the Standing Orders in 2004 may also render this advice obsolete. Standing Order 207 now provides such committes "have power to sit during the life of the Parliament".  (Once approved by the Governor. Standing Orders "become binding and of force" under section 15 of the Constiution Act, 1902 (NSW).)

As the Standing Orders now  clearly provide, a committee can still sit after a session has been prorogued, it is difficult to see why its proceedings are not protected by privilege under Article 9 of the (English) Bill of Rights (1688).

The Bill of Rights is preserved in New South Wales by the Imperial Act Application Act, 1969. 

Article 9  provides: "That the Freedom of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parliament."

Absent an express legislative provision exempting  meetings of a committee  when Parliament is not sitting, Article  9 surely applies.  


And even if the hearings were not protected by parliamentary privilege, as the Rev. Fred Nile  says,  who would be the plaintiff in an action.

" Is it seriously suggested the Premier would sue for defamation?"  he asked during an interview with Radio 2GB on 29 December.

In any event the Standing Order would appear to settle the matter.




...Premier's slender reeds...





in the meantime, the President of the Council , Amanda Fazio, was said to be “doubtful, and wants more advice.”

The Herald says she could  deny staff and resources to the inquiry. But surely this would be improper if the Committee can still lawfully sit.

Ms. Fazio is herself in some difficulty, at least in the political sense. She has been suspended from the Labor Party for voting against the party line on what the Herald descibes as “ a vote on porn shops."

“To such slender reeds does Keneally cling,” concludes the newspaper.

 

 
 
< Prev
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
December 2017 January 2018
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 48 1 2
Week 49 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Week 50 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Week 51 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Week 52 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Week 53 31
Latest ACM News: -