Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Return the Governor arrow Carr's bombshell: why he did that to the Governor

Carr's bombshell: why he did that to the Governor Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Friday, 25 November 2005
In a bombshell admission, the former NSW Premier, Hon. Bob Carr has thrown new light on his extraordinary decision to throw the Governor out of Government House.

In 1996, during the Keating led euphoria of a republic whose early birth was deemed inevitable by Australia’s elites, Carr decided he would make his mark on republican history.

He would not only throw the Governor out of his home, Government House, he would make the office part time!

Those ceremonial functions the Premier deemed “excessive, irrelevant and unbecoming” would be removed.

That a premier would think he was entitled or authorised to make such a decision is an indication of a disregard of the checks and balances on power in our constitutional system.

Carr announced that the new Governor, the Hon Gordon Samuels would continue to live at Bronte, with reduced staff and functions, and continue as Chairman of the Law Reform Commission.

This, Carr curiously said, would bring the office closer to the people.

Carr was photographed, Svengali-like, standing behind the seated Governor. His quip:’That’s one for Jack Lang!’ sent a shudder through those astounded that a Premier would harbour a longing to take revenge on a Governor who had dismissed a Premier for persisting in an illegal course of conduct sixty four years earlier!

Carr’s decision shocked the state and the nation. The reaction among the public, the Parliament, the Caucus and even the Cabinet was almost completely one of disapproval.

There were rumblings in his party, and fears this could impact on the coming federal election.

Writing that the Premier and the Prime Minister Paul Keating thoroughly detested one another, PP McGuinness wrote that” If Keating loses the Prime Ministership, he will certainly blame it on Carr’s initiative in downgrading the status of Governor of NSW”

(See Sir David Smith, Head of State, 2005, Macleay Press, Paddington)

And as Sir David Smith points out, seven weeks later, Paul Keating did indeed lose the prime ministership, and less than four years later the Australian people decisively rejected the Keating-Turnbull republic. Soon after making his decision, Carr had to backtrack. The Governor was not to be, as one newspaper quipped,” His Part- Time Excellency”.

The impossibility and unconstitutionality of the Governor continuing in a subordinate office of profit under the Crown threatened to create a major scandal.

Soon the costs of the decision escalated when it was realized that security would have to be maintained in not one but three places in different parts of Sydney. In fact, the decision proved substantially more costly than before.

And in the last year, there were fewer visitors than during the time of the last Governor in residence.

In addition to the increased costs, the evidence that the House was no more accessible to the public than it had been, there were two other disadvantages which Carr had obviously not thought about.

One is for the Governor. She must move, regularly, between her home, her office and Government House. Indeed, at the mere hint of a photo opportunity showing him walking into the grounds, Carr would insist the Governor receive him at Government House.

This constant movement, with its security demands , has become more difficult as traffic conditions ironically worsened in Sydney during the period of the Carr administration.

The other disadvantage is that nobody who lives outside of Sydney, however eminent, can now be appointed as Governor. Where would he or she live?

Was this a studied insult to those who do not live in Sydney? Or was it , like the decision to make the office part time, indicative of a careless , ill thought out decision more appropriate to some other land where hatreds are timeless and irrational- an act of revenge on the memory of Sir Phillip Game?

Notwithstanding the fact that this was almost universally seen as a very bad decision, and he had to abandon his wish to make the office part time, Carr never relented in keeping the Governor out of Government House, except when it suited him.

Carr's recent bombshell explains his why he was so stubborn.

We'll continue this story in our next column

Until next time,

David Flint

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/whitlam-leaves-past-behind-with-gifts-from-high-time-and-low/2005/11/07/1131212008743.html

Click here to read Bob Carr's "heritage" speech in 22 April 1997
 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31