Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Opinion Polling arrow Signs of desperation: broken hearts and improbable poll,

Signs of desperation: broken hearts and improbable poll, Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Saturday, 07 November 2009

To commemorate their landslide loss in 1999, the republican movement demonstrated just how desperate they are. Support for some vague politicians' republic has long been fluctuating  around 45%, and lower among the nation's youth. On Affirmation Day, 6 November, the republicans claimed they  had access to some poll which showed this had suddenly jumped by fourteeen points to a highly improbable 59%.

And then they wheeled out the tired and claim that Australia’s heart was broken when their proposal was rejected overwhelmingly by the Australian people.

This is no more than a futile attempt to force the Leader of the Opposition and one time republican leader Malcolm Turnbull into reviving their republican push. He won’t. He regrets the way he conceded defeat in 1999. He said then that if the Prime Minister John Howard was remembered for anything, it would be as the man who broke the heart of the nation.

Looking across Bondi Beach on the following day, a  Sunday, all I could see was a nation at play, happy in itself and comfortable in our Commonwealth. The only tears shed the night before came from a handful of celebrities, and perhaps from Mr. Turnbull who was subsequently revealed as overwhelmingly the principal benefactor of the republican movement.

Image
[ Hearts unbroken ]


Mr. Turnbull is realistic about a republic. Not in this reign, he says, and not until there is a consensus about the model among republicans, and not unless opposition is minimal. I have assured him on behalf of ACM that the opposition will be at least as big as in 1999.

In any event he told Sky News (6/11) that he now agrees with Mr. Howard - in many ways Australia is already a republic.

But instead of doing what they ought to do – telling the people precisely what change to the constitution and the flag they are proposing, the republicans went on 6 November, 2009 to Parliament House, leaving baskets of wattle on the veranda and delivering pleading letters to the Prime Minister, Leader of the Opposition and the Leader of the Australian Greens.

Then they referred to an as yet unseen poll which claims that support for an Australian republic now stands at 59%, up from the polling company’s on line poll in May which registered 51%.



...freak poll....



But the poll is not on their site, nor on the polling company’s site.

This poll goes completely against all of the trends, which across the board show substantially declining support for a politicians’ republic.  It is clearly an aberration.

 All polls should of course be treated with caution.

After all on the same day in October The Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian released polls showing who was most popular to lead the Federal Liberal Party, Malcolm Turnbull or Joe Hockey. One said Hockey, one said Turnbull. Only one could have been right.

For the first time since the 2007 election, The Australian’s November Newspoll showed Labor and the Coalition attracting equal support. Then The Sydney Morning Herald’s Herald/Neilson poll on 9 November showed Labor leading by 7 points. On the same day, on the  government’s handling of border protection, Herald/Nielson found voters equally divided, Newspoll found they disapproved 53% to 31%.  

Polls can be useful to indicate trends. Seizing on a single poll which is significantly different from a trend is a sign of desperation.  And it is misleading.



...reservations on earlier polling.... 




 My reservations about this year’s May poll by UMR were threefold.

First the survey was conducted on line. They clearly try to find a fair sample, but I suspect that online and telephone polling is not as good as face to face polling. Most pollsters do telephone polling, Morgan uses face to face.  The use of online polling produces a higher republican vote than other polls such as Morgan and Newspoll. The difference seems to be about 5 or 6 %. (The November poll shows a difference of about 13 or14%.) 

My second reservation is that the question is far too vague and has little utility in indicating how people would vote in a  referendum. For the record the question was: “Do you support or oppose Australia becoming a republic? “        

Even the word republic is ambiguous.  Leaders as diverse as Justice Michael Kirby and John Howard say we are already a republic. They say we are a crowned republic.  Most serious observers expect the electorate to be strongly divided over the model. If the chosen model is the supposedly most popular one, the elected presidency, most politicians and many in the media will prefer our crowned republic.  A referendum must be about a model, which is something some republicans don’t understand. Our Founding Fathers wanted to make sure the people knew what they were voting for.  

Third, as with other polls, the results contain a large number of the undecided. Many do not want to disclose their intentions, or they are barely interested. Experience suggests most will vote against any politicians’ republic.   





...weakness of polls taken before a campaign....



In addition the poll has been taken well before the public knows what is being proposed. The problem is the republicans continue to keep their plans secret both about changes to the constitution and to the Flag. Or they don't have any.  

On the evidence, polling well before any referendum campaign must show very high levels of support for the referendum to have any chance. Once people see the details and hear each side, they will often change their initial approval to some vague proposition. Even on the higher UMR figures a referendum is already doomed.  This is even more apparent with the lower level of support indicated by the long term trend demonstrated under the last Newspoll. It is especially evident under Morgan, because this poll was based on the most popular model.   

The republican politicians know from their own polling that a referendum is doomed. So do the republican movement.

That is why they are pushing the taxpayer funded blank cheque plebiscite,  while keeping the details of change to the constitution and flag secret.  

 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
November 2017 December 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 44 1 2 3 4
Week 45 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 46 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 47 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 48 26 27 28 29 30