Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
Convenor's Column
Media Releases
Event News
ACM News
Resources
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
About ACM
Anthems
Links
Contact ACM
Join our Mailing List
Facebook
Aussie Crown TV
ACM Videos
Polls
Should republicans be required to agree on precisely what changes to the Constitution they want before Mr Rudd calls another referendum?
 
 
Do you agree with the proposed "Super Profits Tax"?
 
 
Login





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
ACM Home arrow Convenor's Column arrow News of the World revenge on the Royal Family

News of the World revenge on the Royal Family Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Monday, 12 January 2009

The latest "beat-up" about Prince Harry by The News of The World should not surprise anyone. The London tabloid has been waiting to punish the Royal Family ever since a journalist and its “royal editor” were arrested over two years ago and found guilty of what the judge described as serious criminal conduct.

For overseas readers we should explain that a “beat-up” in the Antipodes is “a media report that has been sensationalized and made to seem more significant than it really is.” (Encarta Dictionary)

Image

The offence of the News of the World criminals was that they had broken into the message banks of members of the Royal Family and other public figures.

You might have thought they had extracted sufficient revenge when in 2006 another Murdoch newspaper, The Sun , published three year old photographs of Prince Harry in an obvious, underhand and vicious attempt to create problems for him with his current lady friend.


That fabrication went around the world, but when the true story emerged – that these were old photographs – The Sun refused to apologise for its appalling conduct.

Now the News of the World has found – we suspect bought – a video which shows Prince Harry engaging in the sort of banter young men in the army typically engage in. And it is three years old.

It is of course likely that the journalists affecting mock horror at the video have never served their country and accordingly are unaware of what happens in the military. They invite visitors to their site to watch “Harry’s racist video shame”.

Just who do they think they are kidding with their faux sense of rectitude? It would be good to hear some tapes of these journalists; as a profession they are not known for using the language of the clergy.

The terms used by Prince Harry are hardly reprehensible in themselves – all depends on the context and a glance at the video would demonstrates to anyone with the minimum of good sense that these were intended with no malice.

Image

Anyone who is identified as coming from an ethnic minority, and who is a mature person, knows this, especially those who have spent some time in military service or in similar places.

This hasn’t stopped some people from foolishly falling for the tabloid trap to create some sort of scandal.  That anyone would take this tabloid seriously is extraordinary. But some underemployed apparatchik at the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission was reported as saying the News of the World beat up appears to contain “disturbing allegations.” A spokesman for the no doubt self selected Muslim Council of Great Britain described the terms out of context as “crude and offensive.”  A Tory MP called it “unforgiveable.”  He obviously hasn’t listened to the Australian Parliament.

This is just a beat-up by a tabloid that lives on this sort of thing, owned by the American who recently told Australians in the Antipodean version of the Reith Lectures that Australia must become a republic.... so we can be independent.

This is certainly a beat-up by the News of the World to extract revenge from the Royal Family. But is it also part of a broader agenda directed against  the very existence of the Crown as a constitutional institution in each of the Commonwealth Realms?

  

 

  

 




  Comments (2)
1. ONE WAY STREET.
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 12-01-2009 11:27
While this further incident serves to re- enforce accusations about the enormous power of the media owners, it should also remind us of just how powerless we would be to reverse from a republic we did not like. 
All the nations that have had their Monarchy changed into a republic without their consent, have no way of reversing the situation. Modern republics are permanent and irreversible as well as their dictators. Not because their citizens don't want to go back to what worked for them, but mainly because their media will not allow one word of dissent, reinforced by the Army and other powers. Our media cry dissent every day from our most successful Constitutional Monarchy. But that will cease immediately thy obtain what they want. There will be no more dissent from their model, as elsewhere.
2. Prince Harry & the NotW
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 12-01-2009 17:46
The News of the World is as ghastly as you say. But, alas, the incident has been noticed prominently by The Times and The Daily Telegraph. It is as well to mention it. Damage has been done.

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

 
< Prev   Next >

Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

The Book Depository

10th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
Events
September 2010 October 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 35 1 2 3 4
Week 36 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Week 37 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Week 38 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Week 39 26 27 28 29 30
Latest News