Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Media and monarchy arrow Media abuse or public interest?

Media abuse or public interest? Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Wednesday, 23 July 2008

Image
[ Heads of State meet: the Governor - General, the Sovereign Pontiff and Mrs Jeffery]

The visit of the Sovereign Pontiff, Pope Benedict XVI and World Youth Day has concluded. The event was reported widely in the international media, including overseas television news.

A controversy has now surfaced concerning the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and World Youth Day.

The role of the media is of course to report the news, and not make it themselves. While the commercial media may campaign, media ethics require that comment be distinguishable from news reports.

One of the features of the 1999 referendum campaign was the way of vast elements of the media, particularly the “serious” media, campaigned for the Yes case even in claiming to report the news.

As the eminent British media authority Lord Deedes wrote in the London Daily Telegraph on 8 November, 1999:  “I have rarely attended elections in any country, certainly not a democratic one, in which the newspapers have displayed more shameless bias. One and all, they determined that Australians should have a republic and they used every device towards that end.”

His conclusion is supported by Dr Nancy Stone’s exhaustive survey of two representative serious media outlets.

The present controversy does not relate to the debate about the subventions to World Youth Day  by the Commonwealth and NSW governments, which was widely and properly reported.




...a campaign against Cardinal Pell, or acting in the public interest?




Rather it is about what Christopher Pearson described as a “reckless and ill-considered “attempt by ABC Lateline in almost nightly programmes to discredit and bring down Cardinal Pell (“Pell war a cardinal shame, “ The Weekend Australian , 19 July, 2008). 

This centred on whether one particular complainant  had almost 30 years before consented, as a twenty nine year old man,  to the sexual encounter he says wrecked his life, and for which his lawyers have demanded a settlement of $3.5 million. Lateline and other ABC programmes concentrated programme after programme on this story.

 

“If Lateline had done its homework,” Christopher Pearson wrote, “it would have discovered that this was not an open-and-shut case and made an effort to tell all sides of the story. Had it paid more heed to the fraught state of the claimant under the spotlight and the outcomes of previous criminal proceedings and litigation, it would probably have decided that this was a story it shouldn't touch with a barge pole. “

 


On 22 July, 2008 the ABC TV Media Watch programme attacked The Australian and other News Limited (Murdoch) papers for their position on this.  Media Watch  said a civil action by the complainant had only been settled in June, and that documents revealed there had only become available now.  But for most viewers this was news; if he had just settled his claim, what was his complaint?  

 

 On 23 July, The Australian suggested Media Watch was partial; it had not invited the newspaper to respond.

 

The question that Christopher Pearson raises is important. This is whether the resources of a taxpayer funded broadcaster should be used for such a constant daily campaign, and news and current affairs conscripted to this end. Has the ABC adequately answered this?

 

The ABC will say that it was raising a matter of public interest. The matter will no doubt be aired on this in the relevant Senate Estimates Committee where the Minister , This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , and the Opposition spokesperson, This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it are usually in attendance.

 

Incidentally, Christopher Pearson was one of the few commentators who during the 1999 referendum campaign, was completely unashamed to proclaim his attachment to the existing constitution. In the Adelaide Review he coined the wonderful counsel to voters  “Annoy the media, vote No.”

 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31