Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Anthems
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Fiji
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Links
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Plebiscites
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Resources
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Facebook
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth

      Crown

The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls

 

Plebiscites
Plebiscites
2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Polls
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Anthems arrow Articles of Interest arrow The Queen's Visit and Beyond

The Queen's Visit and Beyond Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Monday, 09 August 2004

In her splendid address to Australia The Queen made two important points. Indicating her care, interest and concern for our country, she said she would continue faithfully to serve as to the very best of her ability. Not only was this her duty, it was 'her privilege and her pleasure.'

And the future of the monarchy was for us, the Australian people, and us alone, to decide by democratic and constitutional means.

Both of these points would have been known to any fair and well-informed observer. But during the referendum campaign they were hidden from view. ACM was excoriated for not bringing the monarchy into the debate. But the monarchy was not on trial. What was on trial was the republican model.

And on that the people's decision was loud and clear. In electoral terms a landslide. Seventy three per cent of the electorates rejected the model. (In SA 75%, Tasmania 80%, QLD and WA 93%!) And only about 43% (not 45%) of the electorate voted Yes. Understandable when you think that the ARM had everything going for them.

Unlike us, they had great wealth, out-spending us 5:1 in the Convention elections. Unlike us, they had the use of other organization's foot soldiers, especially to man polling booths. Unlike us, they had support of most of the commentariat who wrote on the issue. Unlike us, they had, if not the open support, the silence of much of the intelligentsia.

What they lacked was what you, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, have in abundance. Unity. Unity of intent, unity of voice. And a rock solid mission. Which was - and is - to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. The core of which was so eloquently and successfully described by our forebears when they agreed to unite in 'an indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown.' Future generations will thank you for this.

In contrast to our unity, our foes had no consistent belief in any form of republic. Their 1993 model unwittingly resembled the worst features of the French Fifth Republic. In the 1998 campaign they wooed the electorate with promises that their minds were open to a direct election model - minds that banged shut as soon as the Convention opened. Then, in its last days, they pulled their second republic out of the hat. The only republic in recorded history where it would be easier for the prime minister to sack the president than his driver! And then during the 1999 campaign they put out at least four contradictory messages about the effect of a 'Yes' vote. The only common theme was to get rid of the Queen. At any price.

Jawaharlal Nehru once said that history is invariably written by the victors. You wouldn't have thought so in the days following 6 November 1999. The very people who had proclaimed the republic inevitable and who told the people how to vote were now explaining why the people disobeyed them. But as Mr Turnbull wrote in his latest book the fact is nobody is interested in his - or indeed any - republic. This was confirmed in a Bulletin-Morgan poll taken soon after the referendum. It found that less that 2% of the people want this issue on the political agenda. The ARM (weren't we assured they would dissolve themselves on 7 November 1999?) is a small but noisy group. They demonstrated how out of touch they were by the - demonstrations - and media interventions they arranged at the beginning of the Royal visit. These were so counter productive, this tactic had to be abandoned.

The latest 'solution' to the problem (the one that doesn't exist) is, if not unconstitutional, is certainly extra constitutional. It's that old favourite of both Napoleons, the plebiscite. The most memorable use of this in recent years was in Quebec. The question on secession was so deliberately confusing that one third of those voting 'Yes' thought they were voting to stay in Canada! A plebiscite is too often designed to give a blank cheque on the Constitution. The Founding Fathers knew this. They'd seen it used six times in France in the 19th century to entrench authoritarian rule. So in the place of the plebiscite they designed the Australian referendum.

As we know, there's no blank cheque with this. You have to put your cards on the table. That's the Australian way. Why use the discredited plebiscite process when we have the Australian referendum? The real question is not some craftily designed plebiscite. Its whether Australians want more time, more distractions from the essential work of all our legislators, and more taxpayers funds spent on this extra constitutional, extra legal folly.

The answer is obvious.

And ACM?

ACM will be there, building its organization and informing the people about the Constitution - students, candidates for citizenship, indeed all Australians. This means giving them objective unbiased information. In these activities we will be doing our duty, preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of this indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown.

 
< Prev   Next >
ROYAL VISIT 2014

Image

The Book Depository
Image
Image
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared

Image


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fiji
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Events
October 2017 November 2017
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 41 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 42 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 43 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 44 29 30 31