Australian Republic Constitution
Australian Flag News Get Involved! Events Resources
Main Menu
ACM Home
About ACM
ACM News
Afghan Court Martial
Book Reviews
The Commonwealth
Contact ACM
Convenor's Column
Constitutional Monarchies and Republics Compared
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Cost of Republicanism to the Taxpayer
Crowned Republic
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Event News
Federalism and the Mining Tax
Flag: Keep The Flag
Governor of New South Wales
Head of State
Keating-Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
Knights & Dames
Latest News and Opinions
Mate for a Head of State
Media and monarchy
Nile Inquiry
Opinion Polling
Orthodoxy and Monarchy
People's Republic?
Prince Andrew
Prince Charles
Prince Harry
Prince Philip
Prince William & Catherine
Prince William In Australia
Prince William: The Early Years
Racist Republic?
Reserve Powers of the Crown
Return the Governor
Royal Commissions
Royal Finances
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
The Succession
2020 Summit
Join our Mailing List
See our selection of videos from across the world:-
ACM Videos
AussieCrownTV - ACM's own TV channel:
Aussie Crown TV
Follow ACM on Facebook:
Self Funded Monarchy
Self Funded Monarchy
Royal Finances
Royal Finances
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Diamond Jubilee 2012
Head of State
Prince Philip
Prince Philip
Special Caribbean Report: Crown & Commonwealth


The Commonwealth
The Commonwealth
Prince Harry
Prince Harry
Prince Andrew
Prince Andrew
Knights & Dames
Knights & Dames
The King's Speech: read the book, see the film.

The King's Speech

Watch the 2010 Neville Bonner Oration: Tony Abbott.
Tony Abbott
Nile Inquiry
Royal Commissions
Royal Commissions
Opinion Polls


2020 Summit
2020 Summit
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Orthodoxy & Monarchy
Afghan Court Martial
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Constitutional Monarchy in the Muslim World
Mate for a Head of State
Mate for a Head of State
Racist Republic?
Racist Republic
A People's Republic?
A People's republic?
Keating Turnbull Republic: The Nineties
The Keating Turnbull Republic
Crowned Republic
Crowned Republic
Republicans' Best Asset?
Is David Flint ( National Convenor since 1998) the republicans best asset, as some claim?
ACM Home arrow Prince Charles

Prince Charles
Prince Charles

Prince Charles, (Charles Philip Arthur George)  The Prince of Wales, KG KT GCB OM AK QSO CD SOM GCL PC AdC(P) FRS was born on 14 November 1948.

As the eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II, he  is the heir apparent to sixteen Realms including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

Since 1958, his principal title has been HRH The Prince of Wales. In Scotland he is additionally known as The Duke of Rothesay. Prince Charles was educated at Cheam and Gordonstoun Schools, which his father, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, had attended as a child. He spent two terms at the Timbertop campus of Geelong Grammar in Australia.

On being awarded a bachelor of arts degree from Trinity College, Cambridge, Prince Charles served with the Royal Navy from  1971 to 76. He married Lady Diana Spencer before an enormous worldwide television audience in 1981. They had two sons, Prince William of Wales in 1982 and Prince Harry of Wales in 1984. The marriage was dissolved in in 1996.

Diana, Princess of Wales died in a car crash in Paris on 31 August 1997.

In 2005,  the Prince married Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall.

Apart from his education in 1967, Prince Charles has often been in Australia, in particular in
 1970, 1974, 1979, 1981, 1983, 1988, 1994 1996 and  2005

..remarkable charity work...

 The prince is well-known for his charity work and sponsors The Prince's Trust, The Prince's Regeneration Trust, and the Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment, among other charities.

ACM has long been indicating something newsworthy not much mentioned in the media - in a typical year he raises around  one quarter of a billion dollars (A$1 billion) for charity.

He has been outspoken concerning architecture and the conservation of old buildings and has produced a book on the subject called A Vision of Britain (1989). He has also promoted herbal and other alternative medical treatment.

Prince Charles In Australia Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Friday, 25 February 2005

The itinerary for the visit of Prince Charles has been released. It includes some functions associated with the Prince's various charitable activities which are rarely reported but have been remarkably effective. The Prince will of course be provided with such security as the authorities deem appropriate. This is considered normal and proper practice in relation to any state visitor or diplomat. Of the various security arrangements made for so many visitors and resident diplomats, the only ones reported and highlighted are of course those of members of the Royal Family.

This of course reflects the bias and the agendas of those involved. Security services are already there, paid for ,on tap, and then allocated as the authorities decide.

As for accommodation the Prince stays at Government House-of course this is no longer available because of the curious decision of Bob Carr to eject the Governor from Government House. This has, incidentally, vastly increased the costs of providing security to the Governor, and means nobody from the country can ever be Governor. Bob Carr cannot bring himself to admit the foolish error which one of his successors will correct.

Prince Charles' Marriage - What It Means Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Sunday, 13 February 2005

The republican movement never hesitates to push its cause on every possible occasion and too often for the silliest of reasons. Remember, for example ,the demand that The Queen return the wonderful painting by Tom Roberts of the opening of the first Federal Parliament in Melbourne by the Duke of York.

This actually hangs, on permanent loan, in Parliament House, and it is owned by the Crown of Australia! It would be equally sensible to demand that The Queen give back Crown Land! But our republicans are anything if not opportunistic. Claiming a surge in membership because of the marriage of the Prince of Wales, but when questioned being unable to reveal any figures, the ARM said this was yet another the occasion to push their republic because the Prince will succeed to the Throne. The Prime Minister said it was silly to draw any link between the marriage and the republican debate. He is absolutely correct. The marriage does not in any way change the succession.

Prince Charles To Marry Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Thursday, 10 February 2005

“Australians will wish Prince Charles well on the announcement of his forthcoming marriage “ the National Convener of Australians For Constitutional Monarchy, Professor David Flint. said today. “The marriage has no constitutional implications for Australia. The spouse of the Sovereign is usually accorded a courtesy title, but not any formal position in our constitutional system. It is to be regretted that activists have intruded into this happy occasion by attempting to revive interest in making fundamental changes to our constitution.

Prince Charles To Visit Australia Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Friday, 04 February 2005

The Prince of Wales will visit Australia at the end of this month, his thirteenth . He was last here in 1994. He will travel to Perth, Alice Springs, Melbourne, Sydney and Canberra between February 28 and March 5, before flying to New Zealand. Prime Minister John Howard says Prince Charles will focus on three main themes during his stay, including environmental initiatives, sustainable fishing policies and urban regeneration projects. There will be a number of opportunities for the public to meet the Prince of Wales. Details are to be announced soon. Readers will recall the strong request by the Tasmanian Speaker that the Prince visit Tasmania. No doubt this will be addressed in a subsequent visit.

Prince Charles: a study in media ethics Print E-mail
Written by Professor David Flint AM   
Tuesday, 30 November 2004
Readers of the British and Australian press will recall that the
Prince had been savaged not only by the media, but particularly by a politician,
a Minister of the Crown, one Charles Clarke, the Education Secretary, who chose
to break the convention that Her Majesty’s Ministers just do not do this.
was all about a private memo, written by the Prince. 
Although privacy is now seen as a fundamental human right, guaranteed in the UK
by the legislation, a convention has been established by the London press and
some of the politicians. 
This is that the right to privacy applies to everyone, even the most humble, but
with one exception.
That exception is the Prince of Wales, and in addition any
other member of the Royal Family.  Everyone else, even journalists are
In any event, a private memo from the Prince was produced last week
with a flourish at an employment tribunal by lawyers for one  Elaine Day, a
former PA at Clarence House. 
  Written in his hand was the comment:
(Quote)What is wrong with everyone nowadays? Why do they all seem to think they
are qualified to do things far beyond their technical capabilities?( End of
He blamed the child-centred education system, which he wrote admits no failure.

According to the London newspaper, The Telegraph, the memo was not for Miss Day,
but was read by her and taken from the correspondence  tray of a Clarence House
official, She interpreted the memorandum to mean that people should not get
above their station.
Note that -Prince Charles never said that. This was the
meaning Miss Day put on the document she stole .
As with anything to do with the
Prince of Wales , the Australian media rushed to play up the interpretation Ms
Day chose to put to support her claim for a generous sum of money over an
employment dispute .
  But the media  ignored or downplayed the Prince’s
response.  As they did the interpretation by MPs and commentators on Mr Clarke’s
intervention.  This was that it was nothing more than a clear leadership bid by
the Education Secretary and, according to the Telegraph, a crude pitch for his
party's republican block vote.
The Australian media also ignored, or possibly,
although I did not see examples,downplayed his backdown. The Telegraph headline
on 22 November 2004 caught this elegantly:
Then the Prince replied, but I cannot find this in our
press, nor did I see it on TV or hear it on the radio. So here it is, from The

( Quote) I might just add that the idea that I think that people should not try
to rise above their station is a travesty of the truth, nor indeed have I ever
used any such words or anything like them.
For the last 30 years I have done all
I can to give young people who have limited opportunities, usually through no
fault of their own, a chance to succeed.  This is what my Prince's Trust is all
We have helped more than 500,000 young people to fulfil their potential. 
I happen to believe passionately that everyone has a particular God-given
ability. Often all that is needed is the right help at the right time for them
to make the most of it.
Those we support have often overcome enormous
challenges, such as long-term unemployment, failing at school, illness and
addiction, and criminal records, and have gone on to succeed in education, get
secure long-term jobs, and own their own businesses, or whatever  Each and every
one of them is a success and my pride in them is boundless. What these young
people have in common is not just a natural talent, but the determination to
succeed through hard work.  And that is the combination that breaks down the
barriers to success.
But success can come in many forms.  In my view it is just
as great an achievement to be a plumber or a bricklayer as it is to be a lawyer
or a doctor.  Not everyone has the same talents or abilities, but everyone, with
the right nurturing, can make a real difference to their communities and to the
This is why I am so encouraged by the efforts which are now being made
to recognise vocational skills in our education system and in the wider economy.

I know that my ideas are sometimes portrayed as old-fashioned.  Well, they may
be.  But what I am concerned about are the things that are timeless, regardless
of the age that we live in.  Also I have been around long enough to see what
were at the time thought of as old-fashioned ideas now come into vogue.
is a good thing and should never be constrained by a persons starting point in
life and people must be encouraged to fulfil their aspirations in ways that
recognise their different abilities and talents. Thank God they do and that we
are not all the same( End of quote)
It tells a completely different story, does
it not?. But the Australian media did not balance their original damaging
report, did they?
The media should get over campaigning for a republic.  The worst was and is the
campaign to publish anything which damages Prince Charles.  Another example of
the campaigning media was the fifth anniversary of the referendum.  The ABC news
decided that the entirely predictable call of the ARM for the issue to be back
on the agenda was newsworthy.  So it became a major story on the news. A major
story?  It was a non story.
Everyone knows that the Prime Minister believes the
issue was settled in 1999, and without his support nothing is going to happen. 
Mr Howard is Prime Minister for the foreseeable future. At some point of course
he will leave the office.
Republicans think this will be their moment, their
1789.  Think again, citoyens!
Only a Liberal leader with rocks in his head would revive this issue, at least
while his position is unassailable.  Never be surprised what some politicians in
a panic about his position might do.
But while he or she, is unassailable, they would know that the Liberal rank and
file, the majority of Liberal voters and the National Party and its supporters
are all opposed to change.
The issue would be extremely divisive.
The Liberal republicans walked into trap
laid by Paul Keating once - they surely would not do it again.
And a
conservative republican Liberal leader would not want a plebiscite process which
led to a direct election model.
Conservative republicans fear that result would derail effective government.
likelihood of this eventually dawned on Liberal Senator Marise Payne.
So she changed her mind, putting in a semi dissent to the Senate Committee
report. This report was furtively tabled on the last day of the sittings before
the 2004 election. 
She is now half in favour and half against her very own ARM proposal.  Senator,
they saw you coming when you joined that committee!.
If the ARM would welcome a
new Liberal leader, they are ecstatic about a Labor Prime Minister.
But the likelihood is that the penny will eventually drop with the Labor Party.
The ALP will eventually realize that they must go to the people with a
programme which reflects the wishes of their essentially conservative
To them, elite issues such as the republic, indicate one thing . This is that
their leaders are out of touch. 
Tony  Blair worked out this conundrum.  The result?  He has been the most
successful leader in the history of the British Labour Party.  And by the way,
he is a constitutional monarchist.  As were all the great leaders of the
Australian Labor Party.
Labor leaders should just check with their rank and file.Former Labor government
minister, Peter Walsh made this very point in his recent  Quadrant dinner
address, an edited version of which appeared in The Australian of 2 December,
He recounted a story of a Labor social gathering after the 1999 referendum where
he was accosted by a state MP who said she had heard he had voted No.
Surely it could not be true.
He said it was, adding he wasin pretty good company because of the high No vote
in strong Labor voting booths.
Yes , she replied , but you know better.
You know better!
That sort of reaction
, he says, was common among elites in both the Labor and Liberal Parties. They
were shocked that the people in every state and by a 55:45 per cent margin had
rejected what the elites knew to be good for them.
He brought the house down with this comment
( Quote) Bad losers as usual, they
demanded a referendum every year or two until the people got it right.( End of
But back to the Australian media, particularly the elite end.  They still
want to bat for a republic, any republic, and are quite prepared to sacrifice
their ethical codes to achieve this.  If any other institution in Australia
behaved so unethically, so disgracefully, they would be called to task-
particularly by the media!
Well, one Australian noticed this, and sent a letter
to the Sunday Telegraph.  The newspaper, commendably, published this on 28
November, 2004:

Sir,   It is a sad day when the British media put forward controversial images
of Prince Charles and do not take the time to report on the wonderful,
fulfilling and helpful work he has done with The Princes Trust and his many
other charities.
Through his work, he has helped many thousands of young people to believe in
themselves and to aspire to better themselves, even to greatness. There are many
examples of his very successful work.
‘Is Prince Charles’ former staff member
going to be prosecuted for stealing, then revealing the contents of personal
communications within his own offices?
After all, she signed a confidentiality
undertaking.  She should be prosecuted or the law is an ass!
Yours Sincerely,

Keith Stuart Bales, Birba Lake, WA

Congratulations to Mr Bales for so succinctly pointing out the facts.
And could
the .paparazzi stop inventing stories about Prince Harry. They are using the
technique refined by Kitty Kelley, who writes so called accounts of the lives of
well known people, Ronald Reagan, the Royal Family, the Bush family etc.

Her technique is simple. This is to publish any rumour or allegation, the more
scandalous the better.Do not subject them to an assessment as to whether they
are true. Imagine if our courts worked that way!
The stories about Prince Harry
usually have so many holes in them, no reputable newspaper would publish them.

Just as no reputable publisher would publish Kitty Kelley. It is just that a
number of newspapers and some publishers were once reputable, but they no longer
are. I suppose that is a sign of the times


On the fifth anniversary of the referendum, The Sydney Morning Herald of 6 and 
November 2004, reviewed the republican debate in cybersphere.

Ours, it says, is a predictably regal affair.  It noted what it called an
amazing outpouring of press releases , often several in a single week.  Clearly
they confused Hot News with Press or Media releases - that is why the name of
this column changed .
They also were not persuaded by comparisons.
One typical
breathless example, they wrote, announces that the five leading countries in the
UN’s latest Human Development Index are all constitutional monarchies. 
Coincidence?  Not at all, crows the site.
Actually, I first noticed this
correlation between constitutional monarchy and this index some years ago when I
was looking at the index when I was teaching international law. 
This correlation  has been pretty consistent in each of the published indexes 
since then.  Most of the top countries are constitutional monarchies.  The few
republics in that top group tend to have tried and tested constitutions-the US
and Switzerland.  Neither have ever been successfully copied-unlike the
Westminster system.
We know that republicans watch this site, which does not concern us. We are even
linked to the ARM, advising readers to go there for an alternative view.  The
ARM does not reciprocate, but  we do not complain about that.  That is their
business, not ours.
This has its amusing side. After the referendum, we decided to make our
occasional national conferences an annual event.  Whenever we announced ours,
there would be a flurry of activity at the ARM, announcing theirs.  There was
one difference.  We actually held ours. This year, perhaps fearing that somebody
may have noticed, the ARM did not announce theirs.
We also instituted a major
lecture, the Neville Bonner Oration.  There have been three. I see now the ARM
has a formal Lecture. 
We do not mind the ARM imitating us. But we would be truly  happy when they
finally acknowledge that our constitutional system , a pillar of this nation,
does not need to be tampered with. 
After all, most republicans say they have been finally  reconciled with, and
even love our Flag.

who have a  Hotmail address are still having some difficulties reading receiving
our emails. Hotmail does  not seem to be able to read standard formatting and
punctuation.  For example, it often puts in a swathe of indecipherable symbols
in the place of the apostrophe!  It does the same for inverted commas!  So
please excuse any abnormal interpretations you may find on our emails if you are
on Hotmail.  When we posted it to you, we had it pretty right! until this
problem is overcome, I have taken some liberties with punctuation, going to
lengths to avoid those which Hotmail can't read. So it is not that we do not
know where to put our apostrophe. It is that Hotmail can not read them.

Until next time,
David Flint

    -  From the National Convenors Desk -

    Defend The Constitution

Level 13 189 Kent
St., Sydney, NSW 2000
Web Site:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Phone: +612 92512500 Fax: +612 92519833

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 82 - 87 of 87


The Book Depository
Prince William: The Early Years
Prince Charles

Prince Charles

Constitutional Monarchies & Republics Compared


Defend the Constitution and Flag
Australian Election Watch

10th Anniversary Neville Bonner Oration

11th Anniversary and Appeal

Crowned Republic 

   Keep The Australian Flag
Return the Governor to Government House
The Succession
The Succession
The Governor of New South Wales
Governor of New South Wales
Fijian soldier
Media and Monarchy
Media and Monarchy
Royal Yacht Britannia
Royal Yacht Britannia
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Republic Audit: Costs of Republic
Reserve Powers of the Crown
March 2018 April 2018
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 9 1 2 3
Week 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Week 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Week 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Week 13 25 26 27 28 29 30 31